Back to the Utah Utes Newsfeed

Targeting penalty: The NCAA's latest controversy

SALT LAKE CITY — Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott gave a statement that has a lot of people scratching their heads.

The issue? Targeting.

The targeting penalty has been a common topic of controversy lately among college football fans, especially those in the Pac-12. The penalty is more than just helmet-to-helmet contact, but is “forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent.”

The NCAA has four points that can help the ref indentify targeting:

  • Launch: a player leaving his feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make forcible contact in the head or neck area
  • A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground
  • Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area
  • Lowering the head before attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet

If a player "targets" another player and it is called on the field, it goes to an official review.