No compatible source was found for this media.
It's such a bizarre topic to discuss. You have the team's best player Kyrie Irving, who some fans are currently upset with because he won't 100 percent commit to accepting a super max contract to stay in Boston. Obviously those same fans thought he's such a talent that he deserves the super max. Those same fans now are also claiming that the Celtics are a better team without him. So you're saying you wanted the Celtics to pay Kyrie a super max contract, but the team would be better off without him?