Hold up a second here.
When we conducted this little exercise last year, we knew what the Bucks were. Or, at least, we thought we knew what they were likely to be. And that knowledge pretty clearly colored our rankings. Young players who had proved little were prioritized over old players who had proved much (though that being proved wasn't always enticing). It was all about potential, because the Bucks were at rock bottom. Nothing mattered but the future and the loftiest of aspirations.
Now we're a year removed, and our assumptions were proven.